7th November 2011

Photo with 10 notes

Trinity Mothers by Yasmin Liang
The colors in this are stunning, and it’s nice to see someone focus on some of the most important but under-utilized characters in comics.
It IS a little disturbing how Martha Wayne doesn’t have a face, but then she always has been defined more by her pearls than anything else. Unless she’s written by Greg Rucka, and then she’s a total bad-ass who calls Batman out on his bullshit. I miss Rucka.
Credit: ComicsAlliance

Trinity Mothers by Yasmin Liang

The colors in this are stunning, and it’s nice to see someone focus on some of the most important but under-utilized characters in comics.

It IS a little disturbing how Martha Wayne doesn’t have a face, but then she always has been defined more by her pearls than anything else. Unless she’s written by Greg Rucka, and then she’s a total bad-ass who calls Batman out on his bullshit. I miss Rucka.

Credit: ComicsAlliance

Tagged: comic booksfan artSupermanBatmanWonder WomanGreg Ruckaart

11th October 2010

Photo reblogged from no with 7,572 notes

i-like-smoothies:

unmundolibre:

Gotham Starry Night (~1funnyguy en deviantART). Cuando Van Gogh descubrió a Batman

hahaha

Everything is better with Batman.

i-like-smoothies:

unmundolibre:

Gotham Starry Night (~1funnyguy en deviantART). Cuando Van Gogh descubrió a Batman

hahaha

Everything is better with Batman.

Tagged: Batmanartcomic booksVincent Van Gough

Source: 1funnyguy.deviantart.com

9th September 2010

Photo with 2 notes

Aurel Schmidt- Presidente

Aurel Schmidt- Presidente

Tagged: artAurel Schmidt

7th September 2010

Link

I can't wait for this exhibit →

Tagged: fashionartI wanna see your peacockPhiladelphia

22nd July 2010

Quote

People hate her, they really do. Did you know that to Yoko someone is a verb in America? It is something that boys say if they’re hanging out with you too much and they’re going to school or they have a band. It’s almost a myth that’s used to suppress women. Y’know, ‘You’re gonna Yoko me. You’re gonna destroy me.’ And this woman put up with racial inequality from Fleet Street, she put up with being accused of breaking up the best band in the world, she put up with people’s idea that she castrated this man and then, worst of all, she had her best friend, her husband, the person she lived for, die in her arms in front of a fortress that she’d hidden herself in for 20 years. And I just feel that the world media should apologise to her because she handled it with so much dignity.

Courtney Love on Yoko Ono, 1993 (via myboylollipop) (via missworld)

I’m not a huge Yoko Ono fan (Fluxus art really isn’t my thing, although that dance song she did a few years ago was pretty good) but let’s not forget she also had to suffer the indignity of being an artist with a lot of talent and ideas who can never have their work looked at fairly because of who they dated. And how much it must suck to have that work totally overshadowed by the public persona you have, whether you want/deserve that persona or not.

Hmm, I wonder who else that could apply to?

Tagged: Courtney LoveHoleYoko OnoThe BeatlesFluxuspostmodernismart

20th July 2010

Post

missworld:

karaj:

johncagecale:

every boy should own this book.

this is the truest thing ive read all day.

also, i am kind of obsessed with pointing out to people that valerie solanas did not actually say that “SCUM” stood for “Society for Cutting Up Men.” her (male) publisher was the one who said this. she did say women should annihilate most men and overthrow capitalism, however. was she serious? kidding? she is so awesomely confusing, and being confusing is one of my favorite feminist strategies

How does everybody feel about Valerie Solanas overall? For me, her attempt to kill Andy Warhol and the negative effect that had on him/the Factory/art outweigh anything else she did, so I’m wondering if there’s something to that whole story I’m missing or if you just disassociate her and her later actions from her work.

Tagged: Andy WarholValerie Solanasfeminismpostmodernismart

16th July 2010

Photo with 23 notes

Cindy Sherman- Untitled #167
I went to the Guggenheim on Wednesday with a few of my friends and saw the Haunted exhibit, which I highly recommend. I spent much of the last month visiting a lot of museums and it was the most moving show I saw by far, and one of the best executed. It’s a very very dark show, especially if you’re more of a landscape and water lilies person, but it’s extremely rewarding.
This photograph was physically too disturbing for me and one of my friends to focus on for too long. It loses so much power being reproduced in this context, but there is a palpable sense of terror and violence emanating from this image. When initially seeing it, it took me a second to notice the unidentified face in the mirror, pushing the idea of the viewer as voyeur (which, let’s be honest, is way overused as an artistic trope although that’s not Sherman’s fault) up along with the horrific sense from the visual, and this is one of the few times implicating the viewer as part of the awful spectacle has resonated for me. It’s not like any of us can say we’ve come across dismembered body parts in the woods (If you have, PLEASE comment), but how many times have you seen (or done?) something awful and just kept on going? How many times have you torn someone to pieces or watched as they’ve done it to themselves? You know whether you identify with the victim, the killer, or the observer (if the observer isn’t just the killer), but which is the worst to be?
Yes, I realize this post doesn’t get into any of the issues in this work/series with regards to violence against women, how it relates to horror (and how very Blue Velvet this image is), use of setting, its importance in Sherman’s career especially in that she wasn’t taking photos of herself any more, etc. etc. I know about those things (no really, just a bit), and maybe I’ll get back to you with a more detailed Cindy Sherman post sometime.

Cindy Sherman- Untitled #167

I went to the Guggenheim on Wednesday with a few of my friends and saw the Haunted exhibit, which I highly recommend. I spent much of the last month visiting a lot of museums and it was the most moving show I saw by far, and one of the best executed. It’s a very very dark show, especially if you’re more of a landscape and water lilies person, but it’s extremely rewarding.

This photograph was physically too disturbing for me and one of my friends to focus on for too long. It loses so much power being reproduced in this context, but there is a palpable sense of terror and violence emanating from this image. When initially seeing it, it took me a second to notice the unidentified face in the mirror, pushing the idea of the viewer as voyeur (which, let’s be honest, is way overused as an artistic trope although that’s not Sherman’s fault) up along with the horrific sense from the visual, and this is one of the few times implicating the viewer as part of the awful spectacle has resonated for me. It’s not like any of us can say we’ve come across dismembered body parts in the woods (If you have, PLEASE comment), but how many times have you seen (or done?) something awful and just kept on going? How many times have you torn someone to pieces or watched as they’ve done it to themselves? You know whether you identify with the victim, the killer, or the observer (if the observer isn’t just the killer), but which is the worst to be?

Yes, I realize this post doesn’t get into any of the issues in this work/series with regards to violence against women, how it relates to horror (and how very Blue Velvet this image is), use of setting, its importance in Sherman’s career especially in that she wasn’t taking photos of herself any more, etc. etc. I know about those things (no really, just a bit), and maybe I’ll get back to you with a more detailed Cindy Sherman post sometime.

Tagged: Cindy ShermanartBlue VelvetTo Be Continued?GuggenheimHaunted

15th July 2010

Quote with 1 note

People are always calling me a mirror and if a mirror looks into a mirror, what is there to see?

-Andy Warhol

Andy, I love it when I alternate between finding you completely trite and completely profound.

Tagged: Andy Warholartpop

21st June 2010

Photo with 4 notes

I went to MoMA with two of my friends on Friday. We saw the “Pictures By Women” exhibit, which includes part of Carrie Mae Weems’ “From Here I Saw What Happened And I Cried” set of photographs. (I really shouldn’t present this image out of context, go check out the whole set *NSFW*, it’s very powerful.)
One of my friends turned and said, “That’s pretty intense”, to which I replied “Carrie Mae Weems don’t fuck around”.

I went to MoMA with two of my friends on Friday. We saw the “Pictures By Women” exhibit, which includes part of Carrie Mae Weems’ “From Here I Saw What Happened And I Cried” set of photographs. (I really shouldn’t present this image out of context, go check out the whole set *NSFW*, it’s very powerful.)

One of my friends turned and said, “That’s pretty intense”, to which I replied “Carrie Mae Weems don’t fuck around”.

Tagged: Carrie Mae WeemsartMoMAracefeminismbad-ass bitches

15th June 2010

Photo reblogged from Things I Ate That I Love with 29 notes

thingsiatethatilove:

kusamapyjamas:

MoMA | Live Through This: Nan Goldin in Pictures by Women: A History of Modern Photography

Nan Goldin’s The Ballad of Sexual Dependency, a 45-minute slide show of some 700 color pictures set to a soundtrack. Ballad’s central driving theme is the intensity of amorous relationships. It chronicles the personal lives of the artist, her friends, and lovers—a young, gorgeous, and tragic group that reveled in the hedonist lifestyle in the 1970s and 1980s in downtown New York City.


All-time favorite

It’s too bad the entire slide show isn’t being presented, but the 10 pieces MoMA chose for the Pictures by Women: A History of Modern Photography are all excellent, and the rest of the exhibit looks pretty excellent as well. Cindy Sherman! Diane Arbus! Carrie Mae Weems! Exclamation points!

thingsiatethatilove:

kusamapyjamas:

MoMA | Live Through This: Nan Goldin in Pictures by Women: A History of Modern Photography

Nan Goldin’s The Ballad of Sexual Dependency, a 45-minute slide show of some 700 color pictures set to a soundtrack. Ballad’s central driving theme is the intensity of amorous relationships. It chronicles the personal lives of the artist, her friends, and lovers—a young, gorgeous, and tragic group that reveled in the hedonist lifestyle in the 1970s and 1980s in downtown New York City.

All-time favorite

It’s too bad the entire slide show isn’t being presented, but the 10 pieces MoMA chose for the Pictures by Women: A History of Modern Photography are all excellent, and the rest of the exhibit looks pretty excellent as well. Cindy Sherman! Diane Arbus! Carrie Mae Weems! Exclamation points!

Tagged: Nan GoldinArtMoMAphotography

Source: moma.org

14th June 2010

Photo reblogged from with 10 notes

missworld:

infinitedistraction:

Francesca Woodman 


A beautifully composed but chilling image. Is the faceless girl the killer, a representation of Death, or something else entirely? All of the above? I think a case could be made for any of those options. You can also go into a lot of Gender Perspectives analysis as well, but I’ll leave that for another time.
Knowing artistic intent isn’t necessary to interpret things, but I do wish Francesca Woodman had elaborated on some of the meanings in her work instead of continually refusing to explain her work. To be fair though, the sense of mystery and foreboding in her work is so key to what makes them special that any direct explanation could have destroyed or minimized their effectiveness.

missworld:

infinitedistraction:

Francesca Woodman 

A beautifully composed but chilling image. Is the faceless girl the killer, a representation of Death, or something else entirely? All of the above? I think a case could be made for any of those options. You can also go into a lot of Gender Perspectives analysis as well, but I’ll leave that for another time.

Knowing artistic intent isn’t necessary to interpret things, but I do wish Francesca Woodman had elaborated on some of the meanings in her work instead of continually refusing to explain her work. To be fair though, the sense of mystery and foreboding in her work is so key to what makes them special that any direct explanation could have destroyed or minimized their effectiveness.

Tagged: artphotographyFrancesca Woodman

Source: infinitedistraction

9th June 2010

Photo reblogged from PURGATORY with 79 notes

(via sacraments, theories-of)

(via sacraments, theories-of)

Tagged: art

Source: theories-of

7th June 2010

Link with 1 note

Abramović also addressed the people who had come before her during her show, whom she saw struggling with themselves, each one. “I believe art should be and will be more and more immaterial,” she concluded. “And this was the most immaterial piece I could imagine.” →

Tagged: Marina Abramovicartpostmodernism

1st June 2010

Photo reblogged from with 28 notes

missworld:

My absolute favorite picture of Courtney Love
I think it’s by Michael Levine for SPIN

This isn’t my favorite picture of Courtney Love, but it is a very striking image. Her head being turned away from the camera gives it a vulnerability that isn’t found in most of her other photos. Her posture counteracts that vulnerability though, because her back is perfectly straight and her shoulders are stiff. She’s still defiant and strong even on her knees, and the starkness of the background keeps your attention focused solely on her, making for a powerful photo.
In other Hole/Courtney Love related news, I’ll be seeing them for the 4th time this year in Philly June 22nd. I’m hoping this show matches the awesomeness of the NYC shows I saw earlier this year, and that she pulls out any or all of the following tracks which I haven’t heard live (and if you don’t know them, you should because they’re all bad-ass):
Plump, Honey, How Dirty Girls Get Clean, Asking For It, Gutless, 20 Years In The Dakota, Reasons To Be Beautiful, Awful, and Playing Your Song

missworld:

My absolute favorite picture of Courtney Love

I think it’s by Michael Levine for SPIN

This isn’t my favorite picture of Courtney Love, but it is a very striking image. Her head being turned away from the camera gives it a vulnerability that isn’t found in most of her other photos. Her posture counteracts that vulnerability though, because her back is perfectly straight and her shoulders are stiff. She’s still defiant and strong even on her knees, and the starkness of the background keeps your attention focused solely on her, making for a powerful photo.

In other Hole/Courtney Love related news, I’ll be seeing them for the 4th time this year in Philly June 22nd. I’m hoping this show matches the awesomeness of the NYC shows I saw earlier this year, and that she pulls out any or all of the following tracks which I haven’t heard live (and if you don’t know them, you should because they’re all bad-ass):

Plump, Honey, How Dirty Girls Get Clean, Asking For It, Gutless, 20 Years In The Dakota, Reasons To Be Beautiful, Awful, and Playing Your Song

Tagged: 90'sCourtney LoveHoleSpinartmusicphotographydivas

Source: missworld